Scotsman has our squad at £93.78m

[Bill8972 479]

 Rangers or celtic - who has the more valuable squad? All 12 Scottish Premiership squads ranked by total market value

Our value  £93.78 million, them £59.18

 

 

[Amokachi 3,014]

Lol that’ll go down well with that mob. 

[esquire8 42,785]

Market value can only matter what another club is willing to pay for them. 

We had minimal interest while they were able to sell players for a high fee in the last year of their contracts. Ours meanwhile run down their contracts and risk leaving for nothing, wiping off said market value.

[The Blues 375]

Looks a bit high but …………

[plymouthranger 3,873]

Market value isn’t really existent right now, until we have a proven track record of our players leaving and excelling in “bigger leagues”, clubs will be reluctant to pay top dollar for our assets. 
 

It’s where the tarriers, annoyingly, have done well and are able to collect gold fees for their players. They’ve sold the likes of Armstrong, Wanyama, Van Dijk, Tierney, Dembele etc for good fees who have all done well for their new clubs. 
 

As much as I’d rather keep our best players, when one does go we really need them to do a turn at their new side…

[peter huistra 1,740]

8 minutes ago, plymouthranger said:

Market value isn’t really existent right now, until we have a proven track record of our players leaving and excelling in “bigger leagues”, clubs will be reluctant to pay top dollar for our assets. 
 

It’s where the tarriers, annoyingly, have done well and are able to collect gold fees for their players. They’ve sold the likes of Armstrong, Wanyama, Van Dijk, Tierney, Dembele etc for good fees who have all done well for their new clubs. 
 

As much as I’d rather keep our best players, when one does go we really need them to do a turn at their new side…

Teams are more likely to come after our youngsters with the success of Gilmour and now Patterson.

It's imperative we don't let anymore go before they have even made the first team for us. 

[The Specky Forum Organiser 64,805]

1 hour ago, esquire8 said:

Market value can only matter what another club is willing to pay for them. 

We had minimal interest while they were able to sell players for a high fee in the last year of their contracts. Ours meanwhile run down their contracts and risk leaving for nothing, wiping off said market value.

Very simplistic way of looking at it.

[gj923 1,457]

wow amazing...........someone at the Scotsman has written a story after looking at transfermarkt values on their site which are always inaccurate

Next week they will bring you how they took East Fife to UCL glory on champ manager

Sterling reporting as always

[esquire8 42,785]

7 minutes ago, gj923 said:

wow amazing...........someone at the Scotsman has written a story after looking at transfermarkt values on their site which are always inaccurate

Next week they will bring you how they took East Fife to UCL glory on champ manager

Sterling reporting as always

Just like when Sky Sports used Football Manager attributes to compare players and signings. Most newspaper journos and columnists are just lazy cunts now.

[BillyG91 5,514]

since OP didn't bother posting it here is the link to the site if anyone wants to read it for themselves: https://www.scotsman.com/sport/football/celtic/celtic-or-Rangers-who-has-the-more-valuable-squad-all-12-scottish-premiership-squads-ranked-by-total-market-value-3373537

if you don't want to visit the site then the list is:

1. Rangers - £93.78m

2. celtic - £59.18m

3. Hibs - £17.78m

4. Aberdeen - £16.56m

5. Hearts - £10.58m

6. Dundee United - £8.71m

7. Motherwell - £7.76m

8. St Johnstone - £7.7m

9. St Mirren - £7.34m

10. Livingston - £7.31m

11. Dundee - £6.5m

12. Ross Country - £5m

[Guest]

They've just taken that straight from Transfermarkt. Journalism must be the easiest gig going these days.

[mitre_mouldmaster 21,509]

Hibs - £17.78m

[KeyserSoze 14,551]

Get them selt 

buy Ronaldo

win the league 

[graeme_4 34,554]

1 hour ago, psb07158 said:

They've just taken that straight from Transfermarkt. Journalism must be the easiest gig going these days.

“Journalism” 

[BLUEDIGNITY 33,647]

3 hours ago, BillyG91 said:

since OP didn't bother posting it here is the link to the site if anyone wants to read it for themselves: https://www.scotsman.com/sport/football/celtic/celtic-or-Rangers-who-has-the-more-valuable-squad-all-12-scottish-premiership-squads-ranked-by-total-market-value-3373537

if you don't want to visit the site then the list is:

1. Rangers - £93.78m

2. celtic - £59.18m

3. Hibs - £17.78m

4. Aberdeen - £16.56m

5. Hearts - £10.58m

6. Dundee United - £8.71m

7. Motherwell - £7.76m

8. St Johnstone - £7.7m

9. St Mirren - £7.34m

10. Livingston - £7.31m

11. Dundee - £6.5m

12. Ross Country - £5m

Gives you a laugh though looking some of those valuations, especially at the likes of the dundees, st middens, and livingstons 😂😂😂

 

[Tomatasauce 1,253]

3 hours ago, mitre_mouldmaster said:

Hibs - £17.78m

Take away the 5m they want for nisbet and the 4m they want for doig, then just under 9m does seem a bit dear for the rest of the dross

[andyhrfc 2,242]

6 hours ago, BillyG91 said:

since OP didn't bother posting it here is the link to the site if anyone wants to read it for themselves: https://www.scotsman.com/sport/football/celtic/celtic-or-Rangers-who-has-the-more-valuable-squad-all-12-scottish-premiership-squads-ranked-by-total-market-value-3373537

if you don't want to visit the site then the list is:

1. Rangers - £93.78m

2. celtic - £59.18m

3. Hibs - £17.78m

4. Aberdeen - £16.56m

5. Hearts - £10.58m

6. Dundee United - £8.71m

7. Motherwell - £7.76m

8. St Johnstone - £7.7m

9. St Mirren - £7.34m

10. Livingston - £7.31m

11. Dundee - £6.5m

12. Ross Country - £5m

Good bet that this will be the order for the final table. Well certainly 1 and 2.

[ayrshireranger 8,085]

That'll do.

[SkylineBlue 23,391]

17 hours ago, psb07158 said:

They've just taken that straight from Transfermarkt. Journalism must be the easiest gig going these days.

Not if you've got a shady tweeting history and write hit pieces on shady tweet histories...

[King Jela 20,364]

22 hours ago, esquire8 said:

Market value can only matter what another club is willing to pay for them. 

We had minimal interest while they were able to sell players for a high fee in the last year of their contracts. Ours meanwhile run down their contracts and risk leaving for nothing, wiping off said market value.

Is it Morelos, Kent and Kamara that'll have a year left after next summer? 

[esquire8 42,785]

35 minutes ago, King Jela said:

Is it Morelos, Kent and Kamara that'll have a year left after next summer? 

Aribo, Jack and Helander too. 

Goldson, Arfield, Davis, McGregor, Balogun and McLaughlin up this summer.

[JograBear 1,074]

1 hour ago, esquire8 said:

Goldson, Arfield, Davis, McGregor, Balogun and McLaughlin up this summer.

Think Goldson and McLaughlin would be the only ones Id renew.

[The Godfather 71,907]

Something positive about us... Let's pick it to bits to make it look shite. 

Sounds about right 

[HuistraHairDo 12,490]

1 hour ago, JograBear said:

Think Goldson and McLaughlin would be the only ones Id renew.

Why? 

McGregor just got POTY, Balogun just had a MOTM performance against the scum, Davis is probably the best midfield passer of the ball at the club, Arfield I could live with as long as we get Jack up and running.

Do I watch different games to other ppl or something?

[JograBear 1,074]

3 hours ago, HuistraHairDo said:

Why? 

McGregor just got POTY, Balogun just had a MOTM performance against the scum, Davis is probably the best midfield passer of the ball at the club, Arfield I could live with as long as we get Jack up and running.

Do I watch different games to other ppl or something?

McGregor - Will turn 40 in January. Last season. Time to give McRorie his chance.

Balogun - Getting on a bit at 33. We would do better nurturing a younger player.

Davis - 37 in January. Last season. 

Arfield - 33 in November. Last legs. Not good enough.