Jump to content

Should we financially help other clubs


Bad Robot

Should we financially help other clubs   

407 members have voted

  1. 1. Should we financially help other clubs

    • Yes
      7
    • No
      350
    • A select few but mostly No
      45
    • I don’t know
      4


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 343
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, Howsitgoing said:

Quite often for things to get better it has to get worse. We need rid of the fenian corruption and football teams having to shut down should help bring down their cabal. 

That's a good way of looking at it. Let's start with Raith, Alloa & Dunfermline.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The Librarian said:

I can't even pass for human when I'm plastered so if he can pass for Colombian 🇨🇴👍

Never mind that shit, I genuinely had Billy thinking I was a Spanish guy called Inigo for a while. :lol:

Agua por favor, Billy. Defo agua imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dennis Reynolds said:

No, most likely not and no I doubt any Rangers fan will forget 2012.... it is most likely keeping teams afloat will be financially in Rangers interest though. 

Nonsense. I hate this myth that's trotted out in defence of bridge-building. Us and the tarriers, combined, only need 8 other teams for a league.

Draining the swamp will consolidate things, make the little drop stronger naturally.

We don't need 40+ professional teams, across 4-leagues in Scotland - It's far too much, and the opposite is true (the claim that it hampers the game overall - if the state of the game is your primary concern over Rangers

2 hours ago, Bill8972 said:

Our money is OUR money. 

Unless it's 2012 again and the SPFL and SFA decided to keep millions of our money for having the audacity to go into administration after being the victims of a fraudulent takeover. Yet there's still Rangers fans who want Scottish clubs to do well in Europe and support that national team :anguish:

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, British_Empire said:

Nonsense. I hate this myth that's trotted out in defence of bridge-building. Us and the tarriers, combined, only need 8 other teams for a league. Draining the swamp will consolidate things, make the little drop stronger naturally. We don't need 40+ professional teams, across 4-leagues in Scotland. It's far too much and the opposite is true in that it hampers the game overall (if the state of the game is your primary concern over Rangers).

I agree we don't need 40 teams, we most likely though do need all teams currently in the league we play in to complete the season in order to honor deals signed with sponsors and TV companies. 

My main concern as mentioned earlier is Rangers, state of the game is neither here nor there to me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 11 May 2024 11:30 Until 13:30
      0  
      celtic v Rangers
      celtic Park
      Scottish Premiership
      Live on Sky Sports Football HD and Sky Sports Main Event

×
×
  • Create New...