Jump to content

C*ltc


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
9 hours ago, Gandalf the Blue said:

celtic have been charged by Uefa for disturbances during their Europa League match against AIK Stockholm last week.

The offences relate to fans setting off fireworks and throwing objects as well as blocking stairways during the play-off second leg.

The Scottish champions will learn their fate at a hearing on 19 September when the Uefa Control, Ethics and Disciplinary Body meet.

celtic won the tie 6-1 on aggregate to progress to the group stage.

Their last charge from European football's governing body came in 2017when a fan ran on to the pitch at celtic Park and aimed a kick at Paris St-Germain striker Kylian Mbappe, resulting in a £8,900 fine.

In July of that year, celtic were also fined £20,600 after an "illicit banner" was displayed during their Champions League qualifying win over Linfield.

It comes less than a week after Rangers were ordered by Uefa to close a section of Ibrox for a second time after being found guilty of a second charge of sectarian chanting.

Guaranteed they won't be getting 3000 seats taken off them. Wankers

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ritchieshearercaldow said:

That’s what I thought, how many defenders do they need ffs.

Maybe changing their tatics and going to be parking big busses.

Probably to match up will all our wingers....

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Hadron Collider said:

Where’s the article mate? 

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/big-clubs-and-youth-teams-not-separate-insists-scottish-football-sex-abuse-review-c28m3zzmw

The Independent Review of Sexual Abuse in Scottish Football has concluded that big clubs cannot distance themselves from abuse that took place within affiliated feeder clubs.

celtic Boys Club is not mentioned by name in the report, but its authors are satisfied that it was “inextricably” linked with celtic FC when widespread sexual abuse, which has resulted in a series of recent convictions, took place.

The Times understands that senior figures in the review team have made this clear, in explicit terms, to celtic FC.

The Parkhead club maintains that the boys’ club was a separate entity and, as such, it has no legal culpability. That stance is undermined in the interim report of the review commissioned by the Scottish FA.

It states: “Historically in Scotland, in some areas, community-based youth football clubs have come into existence, developed and grown with an identity shared with the local senior professional club. In some cases, these are quite prominent. Essentially, they were ‘feeder’ clubs but with a relationship that went well beyond the throughput of young talent.”

The review says that the ties between the senior club and youth teams were “clear and strong” and they were part of the same “family”. Officials of both clubs knew each other well and the senior club allowed the youth club to freely use its premises and facilities and the branding, colours and strips were almost if not identical, it adds.

The review concludes that “if the relationship and history between the youth football club and the senior club was so shared, so close and so inextricable on positive achievements then when alleged sexual abuse of young players formed part of the history of one then it too formed part of the history of the other. A shared heritage is not confined to trophies, victories and celebration. It also extends to defeats, failures, and deficiencies. There are many downsides to this which sometimes overshadow the positives . . . At times the closeness of this relationship might, in the past, have manifested in a ‘closing of ranks’ if not a collusion. This is not surprising since any ‘reputational damage’ to one is therefore shared by the other.

“Where the review has found that when allegations of sexual abuse have been made concerning the community-based youth football club our expectation would have been that the senior club (almost like a parent) would have taken steps to put this right permanently by doing the right thing. Unfortunately, we have seen some instances where this has not been the case and the senior club’s response has centred on protection of its reputation and standing rather than addressing the core problem with a view to achieving a permanent solution.”

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, KingKirk said:

Taylor's da should be ashamed of himself.

Is he not the most stereotypical wee taig ??

just seen his interview on SSN and I don't see anything remotely resembling Protestantism about him at all.

wee squeaky voice and Jackie McNamara as his agent.

Is he really a jump the dyke..?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 03 October 2024 19:00 Until 21:00
      0  
      Rangers v Lyon
      Ibrox Stadium
      UEFA Europa League

×
×
  • Create New...