Popular Post chic 16 Posted December 31, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted December 31, 2018 Possible yellow for the incident with Ralston, nothing in other two with Brown and Christie. So Mr Sutton, you can run along and keep that big mouth shut, if possible. No chance of a red says wee Dermot. WATP-FOREVER, Real Ranger, chris182 and 8 others 11 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Hamie 4,847 Posted December 31, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted December 31, 2018 None were yellows. They all need to evolve to wee Freddos way of thinking and not the other way around. Steelydan1690, Bears r us, born a blue nose and 4 others 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clemdog 39,389 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 Interesting considering he's as bitter as they come. Hope they showed him the full highlights. dougie76, chris182 and HG5 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Traive 22,854 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 7 minutes ago, ben51 said: Interesting considering he's as bitter as they come. Hope they showed him the full highlights. Said he watched the full game and that only the Ralston incident was worth comment and I have to say that I agree with that. Of course Scotland’s FCO (fenian compliance officer) will no doubt be more qualified to condemn Morelos. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 If you see Mo’s leg flick from the front he isn’t even looking at Lego, so if he has suddenly developed new powers to see where he is kicking without looking then it’s nothing. Ralston isn’t even worth mentioning. The only one you could maybe get a yellow for was the wee dig at Christie. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 3 minutes ago, Colin Traive said: Said he watched the full game and that only the Ralston incident was worth comment and I have to say that I agree with that. Of course Scotland’s FCO (fenian compliance officer) will no doubt be more qualified to condemn Morelos. Hopefully she uses the same rules by asking Beaton if he wants to change his mind and when he says no she goes back in her shell. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 65,025 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 The fact that every single one seems to split opinion says it all Personally think they all could have been yellows, maybe on another day at least a straight red but none of them were what i'd call bad decisions as they could all have went either way HG5 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_85 656 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 All 3 incidents when you slow them down look worse. I was at the game and never noticed any of them as being incidents that looked like yellow cards never mind red cards. I would also say the hand ball and also the lego muncher tackle I also missed but can't remember much outrage at the time. I thought that the ref had a good game tried to let it flow some strong fair tackles going in which was good to see. Bearsden bear, dougie76, Negri's lovechild and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmcf 34,307 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 Surprises me . Not because I think he's wrong , it's just he always seems to go against us . Who is it that even asks his opinion ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blumhoilann 6,712 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 54 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said: If you see Mo’s leg flick from the front he isn’t even looking at Lego, so if he has suddenly developed new powers to see where he is kicking without looking then it’s nothing. Ralston isn’t even worth mentioning. The only one you could maybe get a yellow for was the wee dig at Christie. Thought Mo had a wee grope up his thigh,lol....and Christie folded like he'd been shot,oh deary me🤣 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clemdog 39,389 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 4 minutes ago, gmcf said: Surprises me . Not because I think he's wrong , it's just he always seems to go against us . Who is it that even asks his opinion ? Ref Watch on SSN. They go over 'contentious' decisions after the weekend. gmcf 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 Just now, Blumhoilann said: Thought Mo had a wee grope up his thigh,lol....and Christie folded like he'd been shot,oh deary me🤣 Probably brought back a lot of bad memories for him plumbGER and Blumhoilann 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
harlands plater 16,989 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 Was going to stop reading at “Dermot”, got a surprise when I carried on. HG5 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmcf 34,307 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 5 minutes ago, ben51 said: Ref Watch on SSN. They go over 'contentious' decisions after the weekend. Ah ok . I thought it had maybe to do with their supporters trying to play the victim card . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bears r us 30,812 Posted December 31, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted December 31, 2018 The only reason they were classed as 'contentious' is because it was Alfredo. He is certainly getting under the skin of the taigs in the media. Well done Mo you never gave them a minutes peace on Sat either with your feet, strength and a nice bit of verbals every chance you got. 16BlueSherbert90, Bigdave30, dougie76 and 9 others 12 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brubear 2,924 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 Compliance officer to decide on Thursday if any of the incidents should go forward to the 3 man panel for adjudication. My understanding is panel (3 retired refs) can only recommend suspension if deemed to be a straight red and all 3 agree. I do not believe they can adjudicate that 2 were yellows so a red applies. They look at each incident in isolation to seem if it was violent and therefore meeting a red. I guess the Ralston one is the one they will be most likely to deem violent conduct. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Negri's lovechild 14,132 Posted December 31, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted December 31, 2018 2 minutes ago, Bears r us said: The only reason they were classed as 'contentious' is because it was Alfredo. He is certainly getting under the skin of the taigs in the media. Well done Mo you never gave them a minutes peace on Sat either with your feet, strength and a nice bit of verbals every chance you got. Most exciting player in Scottish football at the moment. The only reason these "incidents" are being highlighted is that they involved Morelos, and the agenda that is against him. Bobby Hume, dougie76, Bears r us and 4 others 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,812 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 Just now, Negri's lovechild said: Most exciting player in Scottish football at the moment. The only reason these "incidents" are being highlighted is that they involved Morelos, and the agenda that is against him. Exactly mate, if they are going to look back at every small incident in the game then they need to look farther than Mo. I assume there is no mention of the McGregor handball that should have been a penalty and a red card. I only saw it today and I would never have mentioned it if they were not looking at Mo. Bunch of Bobby Hume, Negri's lovechild, cstamomusa and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegendofCoop 17,364 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 the brown nut kick was actually justified when you look at the trajectory of the ball (match ball that is). When it's cleared, it was coming down in front of brown, therefore he was justified going for it Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Negri's lovechild 14,132 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 4 minutes ago, Bears r us said: Exactly mate, if they are going to look back at every small incident in the game then they need to look farther than Mo. I assume there is no mention of the McGregor handball that should have been a penalty and a red card. I only saw it today and I would never have mentioned it if they were not looking at Mo. Bunch of That's it. They look at incidents involving one player only, and take them in isolation. I was watching the game on sky and didn t know about the hand ball until I saw the footage at full time. Nobody mentioned it. Same with Christie. I didn't think it was a dirty game either. We were hard but fair. Seems everyone else can do it bar us. Bears r us 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcbear 10,924 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 33 minutes ago, Blumhoilann said: Thought Mo had a wee grope up his thigh,lol....and Christie folded like he'd been shot,oh deary me🤣 As did Ralston who probably never even felt the studs brushing his back, Christie also had a nibble at Alf prior to him tickling his thigh. Bears r us, Blumhoilann and cstamomusa 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kirkiebear 1,013 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 The media narrative has been set. Reason has no place in the process, Morelos must be banned regardless. Bears, Bears r us, chris182 and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blumhoilann 6,712 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 3 minutes ago, kirkiebear said: The media narrative has been set. Reason has no place in the process, Morelos must be banned regardless. Aye,no doubt it's mhedia driven,can't be letting Morelos away wi anything but ignore all the elbows and late tackles from Brown and Co,Scottish Football? Corrupt as they come. Bears and Bears r us 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
terry739 267 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 1 hour ago, Brubear said: Compliance officer to decide on Thursday if any of the incidents should go forward to the 3 man panel for adjudication. My understanding is panel (3 retired refs) can only recommend suspension if deemed to be a straight red and all 3 agree. I do not believe they can adjudicate that 2 were yellows so a red applies. They look at each incident in isolation to seem if it was violent and therefore meeting a red. I guess the Ralston one is the one they will be most likely to deem violent conduct. Does she not have to wait on Beaton's match report and only if he mentions anything can she take it further? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,812 Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 1 hour ago, Negri's lovechild said: That's it. They look at incidents involving one player only, and take them in isolation. I was watching the game on sky and didn t know about the hand ball until I saw the footage at full time. Nobody mentioned it. Same with Christie. I didn't think it was a dirty game either. We were hard but fair. Seems everyone else can do it bar us. I think now we have showed we can beat them, it will get worse unfortunately. We as a Club need to start standing up against this SFA CO. I think I have just seen on twitter that she is referring Mo to the panel. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.