Mason Greenwood

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,848]

I wrote about battered women who kill at uni. I am sad to see little has changed regarding abuser's attitudes in that time. The plus side is that the law takes domestic abuse seriously. I know that if I ever am daft enough to get into a relationship, I, like anyone else can go to the cops and ask if my partner has domestic abuse convictions.

I can only do that because women died to give us that right.

[SwallowsHisOwnSpunk 7,875]

What’s sad is that before he starts any sort of prison sentence Mason Greenwood will earn enough money to live out the rest of his life comfortably.

Cunt doesn’t deserve it, Man Utd should be able to terminate his contract straight away.

Although I bet in about 5 years time some morally bankrupt English or European club will give him a contract.

[RFC55 109,541]

Just now, SwallowsHisOwnSpunk said:

What’s sad is that before he starts any sort of prison sentence Mason Greenwood will earn enough money to live out the rest of his life comfortably.

Cunt doesn’t deserve it, Man Utd should be able to terminate his contract straight away.

Although I bet on about 5 years time some morally bankrupt English or European club will give him a contract.

See how that boy Mendy at city, will be get paid until either sacked by city or he's found guilty?

[.Williamson. 83,000]

7 minutes ago, Blue Nosed Babe said:

I wrote about battered women who kill at uni. I am sad to see little has changed regarding abuser's attitudes in that time. The plus side is that the law takes domestic abuse seriously. I know that if I ever am daft enough to get into a relationship, I, like anyone else can go to the cops and ask if my partner has domestic abuse convictions.

I can only do that because women died to give us that right.

No harm but getting into a relationship and immediately going to the police for no reason to find out if the person has a criminal record is fucking absolutely mental. Proper unhinged stuff 

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,848]

Just now, SwallowsHisOwnSpunk said:

What’s sad is that before he starts any sort of prison sentence Mason Greenwood will earn enough money to live out the rest of his life comfortably.

Cunt doesn’t deserve it, Man Utd should be able to terminate his contract straight away.

Although I bet on about 5 years time some morally bankrupt English or European club will give him a contract.

I think they have to wait until such time as there is a conviction. What should happen is that in contracts  wages should be withheld if a person is charged and if found not guilty paid and if found guilty given to the victim.

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,848]

1 minute ago, .Williamson. said:

No harm but getting into a relationship and immediately going to the police for no reason to find out if the person has a criminal record is fucking absolutely mental. Proper unhinged stuff 

When you have spent as much time in the domestic abuse courts as I have, you become cautious. That and I have trust issues that I am awaiting specialist counselling for.

[ger4life_1872 29,705]

2 minutes ago, RFC55 said:

See how that boy Mendy at city, will be get paid until either sacked by city or he's found guilty?

Would imagine they will need to pay him then if convicted they could sue him for it,  sure Chelsea sacked then sued the cunt that failed the drugs test , mutu I think it was 

[TheKingObv 10,648]

4 minutes ago, ger4life_1872 said:

Would imagine they will need to pay him then if convicted they could sue him for it,  sure Chelsea sacked then sued the cunt that failed the drugs test , mutu I think it was 

Drugs test is football related so maybe a different situation?

[ger4life_1872 29,705]

6 minutes ago, Blue Nosed Babe said:

I think they have to wait until such time as there is a conviction. What should happen is that in contracts  wages should be withheld if a person is charged and if found not guilty paid and if found guilty given to the victim.

Do you just mean in this case ? Or if the ordinary guy in the street is accused of rape , should he have his wages withheld till he goes through a trial ? 

[Siam69 27,063]

27 minutes ago, Blue Nosed Babe said:

I wrote about battered women who kill at uni. I am sad to see little has changed regarding abuser's attitudes in that time. The plus side is that the law takes domestic abuse seriously. I know that if I ever am daft enough to get into a relationship, I, like anyone else can go to the cops and ask if my partner has domestic abuse convictions.

I can only do that because women died to give us that right.

Yes, forget the name of the Law, it's a girl's name anyway, someone who was murdered by a partner who didn't know the person had  previous for a murder of, or attacking females.

Police can and do contact anyone who is in a relationship with someone with previous for such stuff, then it's entirely up to the person to continue with the relationship or break it off. 

[ger4life_1872 29,705]

Just now, TheKingObv said:

Drugs test is football related so maybe a different situation?

Never really thought of it like that , could be 

[TheKingObv 10,648]

1 minute ago, ger4life_1872 said:

Never really thought of it like that , could be 

I'm not sure mate but there's been plenty contracts terminated in football for illegal behaviour but the only suing I can remember is Mutu which was football related.

[ger4life_1872 29,705]

5 minutes ago, Siam69 said:

Yes, forget the name of the Law, it's a girl's name anyway, someone who was murdered by a partner who didn't know the person had  previous for a murder of or attacking females.

Police can and do contact anyone who is in a relationship with someone with previous for such stuff, then it's entirely up to the person to continue with the relationship or break it off. 

Clares law it is 

[Rangers_no1 32,789]

Sure I read City will be paying him unless there was something in the contract saying otherwise regarding being suspended.

They will defo sue him after convicted.

[Siam69 27,063]

1 minute ago, ger4life_1872 said:

Clares law it is 

That's the one yea.

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,848]

23 minutes ago, ger4life_1872 said:

Do you just mean in this case ? Or if the ordinary guy in the street is accused of rape , should he have his wages withheld till he goes through a trial ? 

It would be an interesting debate. Should employers have that right? 

[ger4life_1872 29,705]

2 minutes ago, Blue Nosed Babe said:

It would be an interesting debate. Should employers have that right? 

No absolutely not , it's obv shite when it's pretty obvious in this case he's a wrong yin and the figures involved with wages etc but for a normal person you would probably bd looking at cunts ending up homeless etc before they even got to court and the damage it would cause 

[demise 3,555]

What a disgusting pile of shit. Hopefully gets a nice boyfriend in prison. 

[KingKirk 25,740]

Scumbag little bastard another absolute coward of a man. Who the fuck does that to the woman he's supposed to love. 

If it was my daughter I'd behead the cunt without thinking twice absolute slug

[beararse 6,411]

1 hour ago, RFC55 said:

Madelaine maccann, the taigs, cancer whatever as long as it doesn't get some upset.

Of the three examples you mentioned as some sort of half arsed defence only ‘the taigs’ has any merit as they are the one thing we can all unite against and dislike. Be it direct competition, political affiliation, even religion. There is a tangible reason for us to poke fun at and decry.

The loss of a child, no matter the circumstances and cancer are no laughing matters.

There are only a few professional comedians who expertly deal with cancer as a subject and can find the humour. 

I’ve had cancer which has resulted in various abdominal surgeries, a bone marrow transplant and most recently neurosurgery to remove a brain tumour. Trust me, it’s no laughing matter.

For a fuckwit like yourself to casually chuck cancer into a post as some sort of justification for making crass and unnecessary comments about a potential rape case doesn’t really surprise me. You’ve got form.

No doubt you’ll think it’s really funny …….right up to the point you find out that you or a loved have cancer, where upon you’ll absolutely shite yerself, although on the plus side you’ll probably grow up.

I hope you never have to experience it in your lifetime.

Stop being an insensitive prick and spare a thought for others less (or perhaps that should read ‘more’) fortunate.

 

 

 

 

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,848]

2 minutes ago, ger4life_1872 said:

No absolutely not , it's obv shite when it's pretty obvious in this case he's a wrong yin and the figures involved with wages etc but for a normal person you would probably bd looking at cunts ending up homeless etc before they even got to court and the damage it would cause 

Valid point. It maybe then should be a footballing issue and clubs should be allowed to sue to recover sums in these situations like in Mutu. 

[BlueSuedeSambas 54,162]

9 minutes ago, Blue Nosed Babe said:

It would be an interesting debate. Should employers have that right? 

I don’t think so. Employers could put somebody on gardening leave or suspend them with pay but surely they would have have to continue paying them because in the eyes of the law somebody is innocent until they are proven guilty, even if the evidence is cut and dried.

[left winger 14,360]

16 minutes ago, Blue Nosed Babe said:

It would be an interesting debate. Should employers have that right? 

Can employers not sack someone if their actions bring the company’s name into disrepute? Don’t know if those actions would need to be proven - and employment law has a lower burden of proof, does it not?

[TheKingObv 10,648]

2 minutes ago, left winger said:

Can employers not sack someone if their actions bring the company’s name into disrepute? Don’t know if those actions would need to be proven - and employment law has a lower burden of proof, does it not?

Plenty people get sacked for dodgy social media posts which haven't been proven through the courts, so I'd imagine so.

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,848]

2 minutes ago, left winger said:

Can employers not sack someone if their actions bring the company’s name into disrepute? Don’t know if those actions would need to be proven - and employment law has a lower burden of proof, does it not?

Balance of probabilities and it depends. Gross misconduct could be used.