Jump to content

John Bennett


AGM_72

Recommended Posts

Key question is have the directors been taking money out of the club to, for example, repay loans rather than converting them to shares. Totally unacceptable and not in accord with the buisness model. If this is the case the chairman needs to go. Regarding player trading we have spent £11M and accrued £38M potentially rising to £50M on player sales.  Thats a big gap. Lets not confuse the issue with when we receive the cash, how much we spend on non-football activities, the cash delivered from the Euro run and qualifying for the CL. Balancing the books is why we employ Stewart Robertson at a not insignificant salary plus bonus. The board have not implemented the buisness model which suggests we should have spent at least another £27M and have delivered a set of B team players for the manager. Not sure I would trust Ross Wilson to deliver A team signings but that is a different issue. Serious questions need asked about their failure to implement the buisness model.

Link to post
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, esquire8 said:

He blamed TRF for the zero movement with disabled access. Said they are responsible for coming up with solutions and in over a year they have failed to do so. Another excuse is the stadium itself. 

Never, ever the boards fault with anything.

Who are TRF?

They have carried out various scenarios regarding increasing stadium capacity, it is not difficult to commission a consultancy to come up with proposals for consideration to best suit a section of the support rather than thinking how to squeeze in more corporate clients.

Link to post
Share on other sites

John Bennett is probably the best orator we have at the club and deserves a massive amount of respect for investing and continuing to invest.

Todays interview just confirms the chasm between those that run the club and the fans.

We’ll have another couple of puff piece interviews before AGM and then they’ll disappear again.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Upon reflection I am not very disappointed with what Bennet said. Not every penny can be reinvested on players. Infrastructure also need addressed and that takes significant amounts of money. I agree with that.

The board are custodians of the club and have to take the longer picture into mind. That's their remit.

Bennet speaks well but he could have said more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, GersInCanada said:

Upon reflection I am not very disappointed with what Bennet said. Not every penny can be reinvested on players. Infrastructure also need addressed and that takes significant amounts of money. I agree with that.

The board are custodians of the club and have to take the longer picture into mind. That's their remit.

Bennet speaks well but he could have said more.

Spending £11m on what is now just a vanity with little return on the investment, wasting £7m because the board fucked up with SD, all the while penny pinching on squad development. It's not a great optic right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, esquire8 said:

Spending £11m on what is now just a vanity with little return on the investment, wasting £7m because the board fucked up with SD, all the while penny pinching on squad development. It's not a great optic right now.

Have you seen the business case? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, D'Artagnan said:

Something of a concern, and perhaps symptomatic of a wider problem, that a director wishes to address fans concerns over a lack of communication & the over comercialisation of the club, does so via the platform of a subscription only service.

Sums this board up. Failed to invest properly, screwing every last penny from the fan base. We need fresh blood at board level. This current lot, while they did rescue the club, are a busted flush I am sorry to say. They do not have the resources required to take Rangers to the next level.

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, D'Artagnan said:

Something of a concern, and perhaps symptomatic of a wider problem, that a director wishes to address fans concerns over a lack of communication & the over comercialisation of the club, does so via the platform of a subscription only service.

It's all free on YouTube mate 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GersInCanada said:

Upon reflection I am not very disappointed with what Bennet said. Not every penny can be reinvested on players. Infrastructure also need addressed and that takes significant amounts of money. I agree with that.

The board are custodians of the club and have to take the longer picture into mind. That's their remit.

Bennet speaks well but he could have said more.

Will he address the club completely ignoring all fans who couldn’t make it to Seville and will some cunt inform him that our 150 birthday is going by without any serious recognition.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That interview is all bluster and mealy-mouthed. Everything you would expect from a board member who never played the game.

Billy Bragg once wrote... " There is no real substitute for a ball stuck firmly and squarely. "

Only a footballer knows what that means and Bennett ain't one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...