Jump to content

Another battle with SPFL


Recommended Posts

This mob really are beyond contempt however given the  SR video where he alludes to certain things being unsatisfactory then if we've got them bang to rights then go for the jugular Rangers.

Also   being reported on FF an outside  agency brought the deal to the table apparently at a cost of £500k over the life of the deal on every member club to which it appears The clowns at The National Stadium  sanctioned which makes SR's video all the more damning of these cretins running Scottish Football.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, McEwan's Lager said:

Yeah.

With 32Red as our main sponsor we never went to war with the SFA over William Hill on the sleeves, nor the SPFL over Ladbrokes or Betfred.

this is DP and GP driving this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, McEwan's Lager said:

Yeah.

With 32Red as our main sponsor we never went to war with the SFA over William Hill on the sleeves, nor the SPFL over Ladbrokes or Betfred.

Maybe they came after those deals, someone posted that rule 17 0f the SPFL states any deal signed with a club eg shirt sponsorship before a league deal overrides a later deal requiring clubs to display league sponsorship on club shirts .

 

Clearly what SR was getting at in the video regarding current shirt sponsors.

Blue_Snib and JCDBigBear like this
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, goaaaal said:

Maybe they came after those deals, someone posted that rule 17 0f the SPFL states any deal signed with a club eg shirt sponsorship before a league deal overrides a later deal requiring clubs to display league sponsorship on club shirts .

 

Clearly what SR was getting at in the video regarding current shirt sponsors.

Betfred and Ladbrokes deals were signed after we went with 32Red.

goaaaal likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, McEwan's Lager said:

Betfred and Ladbrokes deals were signed after we went with 32Red.

Wasn't aware of that I see Ladbrokes was 2015 for SPFL & Betfred 2016 for L/Cup .

 

Maybe this time it's a challenge from a position of strength as to the ins & outs of this latest deal that SR turns squarely onto the cabal in his interview for Gers TV.

Hence why no promotion of any kind  of said deal on Saturdays opener at Ibrox and that rule 17 may well apply .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let’s be honest if it wasn’t for us Cinch wouldn’t have ponied up the cash and if we win this then the spfl will look like the clowns they are and maybe Cinch will have a clause to withdraw their offer 🍿 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All weekend Twitter has been littered with comments about how the SPFL is a disgraceful, corrupt organisation who’s only purpose is to keep ra sellik down. 
 

Rangers in a dispute with them now and under every article is comments from their fans furious at us for daring to act against the SPFL who have worked so hard to secure an unbelievable sponsorship deal with the world renowned Cinch. Some laugh. 
 

I’ll be honest and say I’ve no idea if we are in the right here or if we will be found to be breaching any rules but it’s nice to see us defending our interests. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Upcoming Events

    • 27 October 2021 18:45 Until 20:45
      0  
      Rangers v Aberdeen
      Ibrox Stadium
      Scottish Premiership
×
×
  • Create New...