Another refereeing shocker the day

[GOAT 30,449]

Denied an absolute stone wall penalty for hand ball second half. 
 

so that’s an offside goal that wasn’t, a red card, a ridiculous hand ball and stone wall penalty all denied in first three games of the season and one of them had VAR ffs.

as we seen last season eventually in the league this shit will cost us, just because we won today and last week doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be highlighting this absolute shite. 

[King Jela 20,684]

He's a skinny, creepy looking cheating bastard. 

Think I lost my voice screaming at him. Fucking prick. 

[Pure_Quality 3,296]

He should have given a foul for us before our first goal, but he let the play go. That's why we scored.

 

[GOAT 30,449]

1 minute ago, Pure_Quality said:

He should have given a foul for us before our first goal, but he let the play go. That's why we scored.

 

What a referee all his piss poor decision making is forgiven. 

[Drumloyal 15,160]

Just now, Pure_Quality said:

He should have given a foul for us before our first goal, but he let the play go. That's why we scored.

 

He likely only did that due to the fuck up earlier where he pulled it back for a foul when Tav had advantage and was away on the edge of the box in space. 

[eskbankloyal 19,446]

Another bizarre example of a (non) decision that will be overturned in the same fixture later in the season through VAR. Equally, Alfie’s is offside for his goal so it would have been ruled out 

[geneva_ger 9,493]

Bottled some bookings. Guy's a prick.

[Clemdog 39,389]

7 minutes ago, eskbankloyal said:

Another bizarre example of a (non) decision that will be overturned in the same fixture later in the season through VAR. Equally, Alfie’s is offside for his goal so it would have been ruled out 

Madness isn’t it. 

[bluenoz 31,297]

8 minutes ago, eskbankloyal said:

Another bizarre example of a (non) decision that will be overturned in the same fixture later in the season through VAR. Equally, Alfie’s is offside for his goal so it would have been ruled out 

The ball came off Arfield mate by which time Morelos was well onside

[siamthedanger 2,867]

He is the absolute worst of the bunch. Killlie keeper time wasting inside 10 mins and their outfield players just punting the ball anywhere out the pitch to buy time and he done fuck all about it. Gonna be some laugh seeing him work with VAR. 

[Essandoh 21,384]

Handball was outrageous from the Govan

[Malkytfp1 18,787]

12 minutes ago, bluenoz said:

The ball came off Arfield mate by which time Morelos was well onside

Arfield doesn't touch it. The defender running back gets a toe on it but not sure if Morelos is still offside due to that. Think he is as it's the same passage of play.

[Don54 25,576]

47 minutes ago, Malkytfp1 said:

Arfield doesn't touch it. The defender running back gets a toe on it but not sure if Morelos is still offside due to that. Think he is as it's the same passage of play.

The ball was played back across the box and if as you say it was the defender it doesn't matter if Alfie is offside or not. 5 defenders and a goalie and not one of them appealed for offside says it all

[Malkytfp1 18,787]

14 minutes ago, Don54 said:

The ball was played back across the box and if as you say it was the defender it doesn't matter if Alfie is offside or not. 5 defenders and a goalie and not one of them appealed for offside says it all

Aye wasn't sure with the new first wave second wave pish. 

Edit. Ah ok so you're saying the ball was played back and not forward so it's irrelevant where he is.

[hammer93 15,136]

Seriously, what was the stonewall penalty....I genuinely don't remember getting worked up at any time?

[the cry was no 3,044]

3 hours ago, eskbankloyal said:

Another bizarre example of a (non) decision that will be overturned in the same fixture later in the season through VAR. Equally, Alfie’s is offside for his goal so it would have been ruled out 

He wasn't offside, the ball (which was played BACK by Matondo btw) came off a defender and ran to Alfie who scored

VAR doesn't chop that off as it's 100% not offside

[scottyscott1963 18,666]

6 hours ago, King Jela said:

He's a skinny, creepy looking cheating bastard. 

Think I lost my voice screaming at him. Fucking prick. 

Me personally agree he's everything you posted.
No cunt can be that incompetent every time he referees our matches. 

[Roy Hobbs 2,321]

5 hours ago, the cry was no said:

He wasn't offside, the ball (which was played BACK by Matondo btw) came off a defender and ran to Alfie who scored

VAR doesn't chop that off as it's 100% not offside

Playing the ball back has got nothing to do with it.

[Brubear 2,953]

8 hours ago, eskbankloyal said:

Another bizarre example of a (non) decision that will be overturned in the same fixture later in the season through VAR. Equally, Alfie’s is offside for his goal so it would have been ruled out 

The ball in was played backwards so Alfie coming back from an offside position to score is irrelevant. Thats how I saw it anyway. 

[Brubear 2,953]

5 minutes ago, Roy Hobbs said:

Playing the ball back has got nothing to do with it.

Why not. You cannot be offside from a ball passed back the way. 

[ger4life_1872 29,841]

6 hours ago, hammer93 said:

Seriously, what was the stonewall penalty....I genuinely don't remember getting worked up at any time?

Power hand ball

[Roy Hobbs 2,321]

11 minutes ago, Brubear said:

Why not. You cannot be offside from a ball passed back the way. 

https://www.theifab.com/laws/latest/offside/#offences-and-sanctions

Nothing in the rule about direction of travel. The ball only has to be touched.

[left winger 14,676]

18 minutes ago, Roy Hobbs said:

https://www.theifab.com/laws/latest/offside/#offences-and-sanctions

Nothing in the rule about direction of travel. The ball only has to be touched.

If the ball is cut back then the player it is cut back to must have been behind the ball and player who cut it back, at the time of the pass. Therefore, it can’t be offside.

As an example, 2 players have broken through against the keeper. One with the ball is further ahead, draws the keeper out of position, then cuts it back to the other to score. No defenders within 20 yards. It’s a goal, no offside, even though there aren’t two defending players between scorer and the goal at the time of the pass.

 

edit: I suppose there is the possibility of an exception where a ball is cut back, and the other attacker was in front of the passing player then takes a step or two back to get the ball. But, as long as the receiver was behind the passing player, he can’t be offside.

[Roy Hobbs 2,321]

Just now, left winger said:

If the ball is cut back then the player it is cut back to must have been behind the ball and player who cut it back, at the time of the pass. Therefore, it can’t be offside.

Wrong. As an example, Morelos wasn't.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 54,319]

Clancy sees what he wants to see. Rarely is it favourable towards us.

Killie fans singing he's just a hun with a whistle was some take 😄