UB banner - for or against it?

[superallysbears 7,624]

How's it a dig at Beale 🤣

[Brubear 2,924]

2 minutes ago, Bad Robot said:

at the time I was expecting to win trophies when we were down the divisions but looking back it was just stupid thinking and not realistic and bringing up 2 in 11 is just short sightedness by the idiots who created the banner.

Absolutes delusion if they think this will give the team more motivation for next week and it’s just poor timing.

Back in 2012 I had this crazy idea we could come uo through the lower divisions and win the premiership on our first year back. In hindsight that was unrealistic as years out of the top flight and Europe had weakened us more than I had imagined. Biggest regrets in these years was losing the 2016 SC final and not pushing on to 56 last season after getting back on top. 

[Essandoh 21,217]

I mean I voted for it but didn’t realise it was anti-Beale

I don’t see anything wrong with promoting Rangers standards

[BlueThunder 8,454]

This is Rangers through and through - fans at each other, creating strife and division - all the while the filth are in lockstep as ever.

[.Williamson. 82,476]

5 minutes ago, superallysbears said:

How's it a dig at Beale 🤣

With the timing it is kind of hard not to take it that way, especially since they stopped singing last week when the goal was gifted to Partick 

As I said I couldn’t care less about the banner, but aye, hard not to see it as being directed at Beale

[superallysbears 7,624]

Just now, .Williamson. said:

With the timing it is kind of hard not to take it that way, especially since they stopped singing last week when the goal was gifted to Partick 

As I said I couldn’t care less about the banner, but aye, hard not to see it as being directed at Beale

If it is then it certainly can't be about results, they'll look foolish as fuck next week when Mick lifts his first trophy, they cunts are an embarrassment at times.

[Unionblue 3,645]

12 minutes ago, Bad Robot said:

This was better 

would have been improved with  "good riddance Nicola" at the end

[Bluekev 44,106]

1 hour ago, Loyal72 said:

Quoting Beale is current. It's not a dig at him though.

If it is then I'd agree it's pathetic, because Michael Beale has no bearing on some of those eleven years, he's not been here for them all.

 

Neither have all of the current board if that’s the case.

[Bears r us 30,810]

16 minutes ago, Bad Robot said:

This was better 

Not sure what to make of the first one, but this one about Sturgeon is spot on. 

[AGM_72 3,646]

If it's a dig at Beale it's daft, but if the players are worth anything they'll rise to the challenge. 

If it becomes an excuse, then they're not.

[KingKirk 25,658]

41 minutes ago, Brubear said:

You have to differentiate between the standard of our football and the standards of actions taken by the club on and off the pitch. We should maintain the highest standards of both and just because the standard of our football performances is lower than we would all like is no reason to lower standards elsewhere. 

Agree but we are supporters of the club the standards on the park is what matters to most when those standards aren't upto it you can't blame people for having a pop. 

 

[Sparkle 53,614]

As already posted, I totally agree with this 

 

[DMax399 3,756]

9 minutes ago, KingKirk said:

Agree but we are supporters of the club the standards on the park is what matters to most when those standards aren't upto it you can't blame people for having a pop. 

 

Beale has won 13 from 14, and if we had done the basics against them late on, it would have been 14 out of 14.  Not quite sure what isn’t up to standard.

 

[Nk89 1,289]

Disagree with it completely, no need, hopefully fans don't start to turn on Beale if we lose next week. 

We are turning a corner and he has only managed to sign 2 players so far, hopefully the outcome is positive next week but if it isn't I hope fans can look at the bigger picture

[AberfeldyBlue 1,557]

the first banner is honking bairn's pish

 

the wee Burnie one spot on

[MVRanger 2,651]

The Beggars will be lapping this up. Not only is the banner factually inaccurate (you can only win the league you are in after all), having a dig at Beale over last week is a massive own goal considering he did the right thing - and we won. 

The week before a Cup Final against the Beasts from the East as well.

What the fuck are they on?

[Bears r us 30,810]

20 minutes ago, Sparkle said:

As already posted, I totally agree with this 

 

It can never be posted too often S. 

[Assegai 8,004]

Preferred the one about Sturgeon.

[KingKirk 25,658]

36 minutes ago, DMax399 said:

Beale has won 13 from 14, and if we had done the basics against them late on, it would have been 14 out of 14.  Not quite sure what isn’t up to standard.

 

The very reason why beale has been brought in. That’s what isn't upto standard Rangers once again failed to compete for the league title 

[Bad Robot 21,259]

. 

[JackAlex93 11,343]

Can't argue with the banner as it's true. Don't think it's aimed at Beale.

[Loyal72 11,249]

Slight dig at Beale aside. I really cannot disagree with the contents of the first banners.

It isn't good enough.

[Craiggybear 6,192]

2 hours ago, Jamie0202 said:

The 11 years is nonsense. We won trophies when we were in the lower leagues and if we're not counting those trophies in the numbers then we can't count those years either as part of the 11.

This.

 

To call it 2 trophies in 11 years is shite the tarriers come out with. 

 

We won trophies on the journey back up. How can you win a trophy for a league you weren't in? 

 

Don't care who it's aimed at. Its a swing and a miss from UB. 

[Moody Blue Legend 61,556]

If it was supposed to be a dig at the manager then it’s even worse than I originally thought. They do some good stuff and if it wasn’t for them, especially at home, the atmosphere would be poor.  

And I didn’t agree with the goal we gifted btw.  

We’ve enough enemies kicking us at any chance they get.

[Goianegra 4,682]

I agree with it, but theres a time and place.

This wasn't the time or place.