Another battle with SPFL

[Bluekev 44,152]

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,795]

2 minutes ago, Bluekev said:

This reeks of Conflict on Interest. No wonder the sponsorship amount was shite.

[Bluekev 44,152]

Just now, Blue Nosed Babe said:

This reeks of Conflict on Interest. No wonder the sponsorship amount was shite.

Favours for pals.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,811]

10 minutes ago, Bluekev said:

These things happen.....

Country is corrupt to the core, football reeks of it too.

[Fear no foe 2,240]

Hmmm, so a 'third party' was drafted in at the cost of £500,000 to do Doncasters job and find a sponsor, only for them to end up with a deal with someone who they already had established links with. That third party basically got half a million for doing nothing, reeks of a brown envelope job that... Not fit for purpose 

[scottyscott1963 18,419]

6 hours ago, Bluekev said:

wonder if this cunt was on for £100K for the next 5 years.
what a cabal of bad bastards.  

[MattyBlue 17,134]

 

[Hadron Collider 31,029]

Just now, MattyBlue said:

 

Fucking YESSSSSS!

[esquire8 42,990]

Just now, MattyBlue said:

 

SFA ponying up the costs for the entire process of trying to keep Park out the room. 

Surely this is the beginning of the end for some at Hampden.

Sure member clubs will be more than happy to pay for the SPFL to do the same......

[TEFTONG 60,229]

5 minutes ago, MattyBlue said:

 

Wonder how the haters will spin this one. 

[graeme_4 34,658]

13 minutes ago, MattyBlue said:

 

Yas. Mon the Park. 

[Fear no foe 2,240]

[Bears r us 30,822]

33 minutes ago, MattyBlue said:

 

 

[jamess 3,435]

29 minutes ago, TEFTONG said:

Wonder how the haters will spin this one. 

Big bad Rangers cause scottish football cash. The fact they are incompetent corrupt fools will be passed over.  Result Mr Park.

[STEPPS BOY 74,178]

[BlueKnight87 17,316]

56 minutes ago, MattyBlue said:

 

Just further proof the incompetents that run our game. Hopefully this is the end game for doncaster and Co. 

Fully expecting some spin but blaming us again. 

[BloodRunsBlue 1,303]

Alexa....Play Clyde 1  

[mitre_mouldmaster 21,509]

Guys its worth noting that this is not saying we have won the case against the SPFL. Its just that the SPFL & SFA were wrong to exclude Parks from the arbitration.

In saying that, winning this part of it probably puts us in a stronger position as I would imagine the judge has concluded that we do have an existing agreement with Parks which is why he should be included.

If we have established an existing agreement, then it puts us an a strong position to say that we have the right to knock back Cinch on the understanding of a conflict with this agreement. 

As always though, plenty of room for things to get messy.

[gmcf 34,321]

13 hours ago, mitre_mouldmaster said:

Guys its worth noting that this is not saying we have won the case against the SPFL. Its just that the SPFL & SFA were wrong to exclude Parks from the arbitration.

In saying that, winning this part of it probably puts us in a stronger position as I would imagine the judge has concluded that we do have an existing agreement with Parks which is why he should be included.

If we have established an existing agreement, then it puts us an a strong position to say that we have the right to knock back Cinch on the understanding of a conflict with this agreement. 

As always though, plenty of room for things to get messy.

Very true ,  but it was just as important to ensure that the spfl played by the rules , their own rules , and not ignore them when it suits .

Win or lose , good to see us highlight yet another example of their miserable , corrupt organisation . 

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,795]

Nobody puts Douglas Park in the corner

[GersInCanada 7,775]

I never understood why the SFA/SPFL took this to court as they had to lose. Their arrogance has cost Scottish football a lot of money.

Sense would dictate that they drop the tribunal and renegotiate the deal with cinch. Explain there will be no Rangers. However as I cannot recall the last time they did anything sensible all bets are off.

In taking on Parks they were out of their depth.

[The Dude 20,026]

5 minutes ago, GersInCanada said:

I never understood why the SFA/SPFL took this to court as they had to lose. Their arrogance has cost Scottish football a lot of money.

Sense would dictate that they drop the tribunal and renegotiate the deal with cinch. Explain there will be no Rangers. However as I cannot recall the last time they did anything sensible all bets are off.

In taking on Parks they were out of their depth.

The arbitration hasn't taken place though

[mitre_mouldmaster 21,509]

1 hour ago, The Dude said:

The arbitration hasn't taken place though

Yea, but they should not have went to court to exclude Parks as it has cost them allot of money.

They might well win the overall case, but they were wrong to go to court on the issue of excluding Parks.

[GersInCanada 7,775]

1 hour ago, The Dude said:

The arbitration hasn't taken place though

Ok so I used the word tribunal instead of arbitration. The meaning was clear however.

[esquire8 42,990]

https://t.co/xg3YNZO55R