GersInCanada 7,775 Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 @Colin Traive Ok I accept that you know more about this subject than I do. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post scottyscott1963 19,134 Posted October 6, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted October 6, 2021 1 hour ago, GersInCanada said: The SFA report is meaningless. The matter is now in court. If the victims win then scum can expect a slap on the wrist from the SFA in their report. If the victims lose (and I cannot see how) then the 2nd version of their report exonerating scum will be the published one. This despicable organisation were complicit in the fenians changing certain SFA rules,to allow them to escape any sanctions by the governing bodies. Only in scotland is using a legal tax loophole a bigger crime than raping children. How the fuck could you look yourself in the mirror supporting a club like no other. Paisley Blue Loyal, Domthenbud, BlueAvenger and 3 others 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,904 Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 10 minutes ago, Colin Traive said: It certainly is not meaningless. The governing body of the game held an in depth, independent review of this subject in Scottish football. Their conclusion, although not binding on any court, made it clear that the parent club has ultimate responsibility for the boys/youth teams bearing the club’s name and wearing their colours and badge. There is no way that a judge will simply disregard the independent findings of the governing body. Why on earth would he? Binding, no - but certainly influential. The report will almost certainly be looked at and used as a reference on what the governing body believe makes a connection . Pretty sure they are hoping they can squirm out on the seperate entity .Having seperate boards accounts etc .But the SFAs report says as far as they are concerned they are under the same sporting banner . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Traive 23,836 Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 10 minutes ago, magic8ball said: The report will almost certainly be looked at and used as a reference on what the governing body believe makes a connection . Pretty sure they are hoping they can squirm out on the seperate entity .Having seperate boards accounts etc .But the SFAs report says as far as they are concerned they are under the same sporting banner . 18 minutes ago, GersInCanada said: @Colin Traive Ok I accept that you know more about this subject than I do. I’m no expert mate but it seems reasonable to assume that the conclusions of a detailed, independent report ordered by the neutral governing body (no sniggering, please) and unrelated to this class action, must carry some weight as the judge considers the evidence. Of course, if it’s the Rt Hon Seamus Devlin O’Flaherty in the chair, it could go either way….. Bears r us, magic8ball and scottyscott1963 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,904 Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 12 minutes ago, Colin Traive said: I’m no expert mate but it seems reasonable to assume that the conclusions of a detailed, independent report ordered by the neutral governing body (no sniggering, please) and unrelated to this class action, must carry some weight as the judge considers the evidence. Of course, if it’s the Rt Hon Seamus Devlin O’Flaherty in the chair, it could go either way….. One of those anomalies particular to modern Scotland where you can be shocked and not surprised at whatever decision is made 🤔 graeme_4, Bears r us and Colin Traive 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bears r us 31,337 Posted October 6, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted October 6, 2021 24 minutes ago, Colin Traive said: I’m no expert mate but it seems reasonable to assume that the conclusions of a detailed, independent report ordered by the neutral governing body (no sniggering, please) and unrelated to this class action, must carry some weight as the judge considers the evidence. Of course, if it’s the Rt Hon Seamus Devlin O’Flaherty in the chair, it could go either way….. Was this fine upstanding chap 👇 the person who did the independent report, or have I got that wrong?? BlueAvenger, Straight-Edge-Loyal, scottyscott1963 and 3 others 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post We Will Follow Rangers 13,394 Posted October 6, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted October 6, 2021 I would imagine a quick swatch at national insurance contributions made from 1966 onward showing that 4 convicted abusers at cbc were on cfc's payroll will blow away any separate entity nonsense jintybear, markem, TEFTONG and 11 others 14 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin 13,715 Posted October 6, 2021 Author Share Posted October 6, 2021 26 minutes ago, We Will Follow Rangers said: I would imagine a quick swatch at national insurance contributions made from 1966 onward showing that 4 convicted abusers at cbc were on cfc's payroll will blow away any separate entity nonsense P#1 was allowed back in an "administritive role" in the boys club........ Yet he was on the testimonial committee of several stars including Davie Provo and kit msn Nellie Mochan. Seperate entity my arse! Bears r us, We Will Follow Rangers and Cracked Actor 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post We Will Follow Rangers 13,394 Posted October 6, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted October 6, 2021 5 minutes ago, mrmojorisin said: P#1 was allowed back in an "administritive role" in the boys club........ Yet he was on the testimonial committee of several stars including Davie Provo and kit msn Nellie Mochan. Seperate entity my arse! King Jela, Cracked Actor, mrmojorisin and 6 others 9 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin 13,715 Posted October 6, 2021 Author Share Posted October 6, 2021 1 hour ago, Bears r us said: Was this fine upstanding chap 👇 the person who did the independent report, or have I got that wrong?? The man who couldnt spot a paedophile in a room of Jimmy Saviles . Bears r us and ronniescu 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post mrmojorisin 13,715 Posted October 6, 2021 Author Popular Post Share Posted October 6, 2021 1 hour ago, Bears r us said: Was this fine upstanding chap 👇 the person who did the independent report, or have I got that wrong?? This man was deemed fit and proper to lead an enquiry into child abuse. This man worked with one of Scotlands worst Paedophiles at the LBGTQ nerwork. Stinking innit Bears r us, scottyscott1963, geneva_ger and 3 others 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,904 Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 7 minutes ago, mrmojorisin said: This man was deemed fit and proper to lead an enquiry into child abuse. This man worked with one of Scotlands worst Paedophiles at the LBGTQ nerwork. Stinking innit An investigation set up to find what it was told to find . Evidence of cross border trafficking ignored and not contained in the report . Good inquiry that . You would think that anybody trusted with such a revelation would have been all over that and called in reserves to widen the investigation. scottyscott1963 and Bears r us 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin 13,715 Posted October 6, 2021 Author Share Posted October 6, 2021 7 minutes ago, magic8ball said: An investigation set up to find what it was told to find . Evidence of cross border trafficking ignored and not contained in the report . Good inquiry that . You would think that anybody trusted with such a revelation would have been all over that and called in reserves to widen the investigation. The whole thing was a sham and left a lot of unanswered questions Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 31,337 Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 1 hour ago, mrmojorisin said: This man was deemed fit and proper to lead an enquiry into child abuse. This man worked with one of Scotlands worst Paedophiles at the LBGTQ nerwork. Stinking innit It really is astonishing how that guy got the job. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin 13,715 Posted October 6, 2021 Author Share Posted October 6, 2021 2 hours ago, Bears r us said: It really is astonishing how that guy got the job. Shoking given his links to a paedophile Bears r us, scottyscott1963 and magic8ball 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackAlex93 12,553 Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 Can't help but feel the magic CFC broom will come out to play here aided by many in high places..... Nothing would surprise me in this cesspit country. ayrshireranger, Kaydubya11, Blueshoff and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post superallysbears 8,199 Posted October 6, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted October 6, 2021 7 hours ago, Bears r us said: Was this fine upstanding chap 👇 the person who did the independent report, or have I got that wrong?? Even just the look of this cunt tells you all you need to know 🤮 Bears r us, scottyscott1963, JackAlex93 and 3 others 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottyscott1963 19,134 Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 18 minutes ago, superallysbears said: Even just the look of this cunt tells you all you need to know 🤮 you can bet the evidence is on his hard drive. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 21,639 Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 You'd imagine this would fuck them, or at least put a big dent in them, but this is Scotland, so... scottyscott1963, JackAlex93 and Bears r us 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin 13,715 Posted October 6, 2021 Author Share Posted October 6, 2021 9 hours ago, Colin Traive said: It certainly is not meaningless. The governing body of the game held an in depth, independent review of this subject in Scottish football. Their conclusion, although not binding on any court, made it clear that the parent club has ultimate responsibility for the boys/youth teams bearing the club’s name and wearing their colours and badge. There is no way that a judge will simply disregard the independent findings of the governing body. Why on earth would he? Binding, no - but certainly influential. When it comes to the punishment of this vile club lets hope the SFA still hold that same view. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Will Follow Rangers 13,394 Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 8 minutes ago, King Jela said: You'd imagine this would fuck them, or at least put a big dent in them, but this is Scotland, so... The 25 will only be a test case , its the tip of the iceberg, the compensation wont sink them, the real damage will be their guilt being paraded around the world, cant see this not impacting future sponsorships kit deals ect. Any other business that has enabled and covered up the activities of up to 14 paedophiles over 50 years and put their brand before protecting hundreds of victims would be raised to the ground, wont happen obv, domestically, excuses will be found but internationally and in corporate circles you would wonder who would want their brand linked to that? That's where the real dent will come. LiverpoolBlue, King Jela and scottyscott1963 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Malkytfp1 19,648 Posted October 7, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted October 7, 2021 It's mad that their fans follow the same "silence". Have a gander over on their forums and the top articles are all about Rangers and refs. In fact there is nothing about this. It's like they learned if they remain silent it might go away. King Jela, Bears r us, graeme_4 and 3 others 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hadron Collider 32,357 Posted October 7, 2021 Share Posted October 7, 2021 Any sponsors bailing on them yet? Hmmm. Fucking enablers if not. BlueAvenger and Bears r us 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin 13,715 Posted October 7, 2021 Author Share Posted October 7, 2021 1 hour ago, Hadron Collider said: Any sponsors bailing on them yet? Hmmm. Fucking enablers if not. Once the truth of what went on there comes tumbling out these sponsors will be having serious doubts about doing any business with them. Who would do business with paedophiles? Oh wait........ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdzKyle 8,583 Posted October 7, 2021 Share Posted October 7, 2021 3 hours ago, mrmojorisin said: Once the truth of what went on there comes tumbling out these sponsors will be having serious doubts about doing any business with them. Who would do business with paedophiles? Oh wait........ BBC will be readying a sponsorship for them as we speak. delparlane, Bluekev, Paisley Blue Loyal and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.