JizzyMonkey 59 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 Well, now that the compliance officer has cleared Shagger is it not about time he was going after Tom Rogic? Shockingly and scandalously it won’t now change the outcome of the game but by banning him retrospectively will punish the Terrorist Fannybois for their next game To add a footnote why is Shagger being persecuted by other fans and sections of the mhedia? Last week at Motherwell and just on Sunday against the bheasts with people calling for the compliance officer to get involved? My only thought is others are running scared because they know that with a few tweaks here and there that the Rangers are back and will be right in the mix until the death We May not get 55 this year but we’ll sure as fuck get our 55 before they get their 10 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Ozblue 4,331 Posted September 5, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted September 5, 2018 1 hour ago, JizzyMonkey said: Well, now that the compliance officer has cleared Shagger is it not about time he was going after Tom Rogic? Shockingly and scandalously it won’t now change the outcome of the game but by banning him retrospectively will punish the Terrorist Fannybois for their next game To add a footnote why is Shagger being persecuted by other fans and sections of the mhedia? Last week at Motherwell and just on Sunday against the bheasts with people calling for the compliance officer to get involved? My only thought is others are running scared because they know that with a few tweaks here and there that the Rangers are back and will be right in the mix until the death We May not get 55 this year but we’ll sure as fuck get our 55 before they get their 10 The reason nothing was done about McGregor is probably that it would have led to calls for the compliance officer to make a judgement on Rogic. The same thing happened the other week when Naismith got off after having a go at Broonaldo. If Naismith had copped a suspension the lego muncher would have got one also. You can't have tarriers getting penalised. Bobby Hume, jintybear, Blumhoilann and 3 others 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kplfishtank 4,657 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 What did Rogic do? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozblue 4,331 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 5 minutes ago, kplfishtank said: What did Rogic do? As far as I could see, not much, but the majority from our side is of the opinion Rogic fouled Jack on the build-up to their goal. HG5 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post wullyRFC 5,230 Posted September 5, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted September 5, 2018 The CO, rightly, got involved because he kicked out at Ajer. The fact he got away with it goes against the big conspiracy theory. Rogic? Just go back to bed. King Jela, RJMcGregor, ForeverAndEver and 2 others 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post SeparateEntityMyArse 53,780 Posted September 5, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted September 5, 2018 The CO has taken action by reviewing the McGregor incident. It was rightly deemed by the panel as not excessive or brutal enough to warrant a red. They can't issue a yellow so the review is complete. We got lucky it was MISSED on Sunday, as likely he would have been wrongly red carded. A yellow and penalty to scum was the correct decision. We were lucky officials MISSED an incident. They didn't actually make a decision in our favour at the time, they simply failed to observe a foul. Maybe no one at the side shouted "foul foul foul" to alert the ref..... The incident which should be highlighted and reviewed was the Christie dive. Simulation looking for a penalty. Blatant dive. Our player booked for the challenge, a yellow that can't be rescinded. That's the talking point that shouldn't be ignored. And thats a yellow that will contribute to a game suspension in due course when he accumulates more and passes the disciplinary threshold. Cheats never win? In this case they have. Simulation incidents seen by refs can still be reviewed I'm sure. Rogic for the Jack incident? Behave. BridgeIsBlue, Marco, whatnobeer and 3 others 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy1984 6,314 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 Rogic and Jack was a tangle of legs and probably was a foul for us, if it was the other way round would you want jack to stop and say “I fouled him there” and if he didn’t he should be banned? Come on to fuck. HG5 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jintybear 8,536 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 59 minutes ago, Ozblue said: The reason nothing was done about McGregor is probably that it would have led to calls for the compliance officer to make a judgement on Rogic. The same thing happened the other week when Naismith got off after having a go at Broonaldo. If Naismith had copped a suspension the lego muncher would have got one also. You can't have tarriers getting penalised. I was listening to H&H yesterday and apparently there is no precedence set over any previous game. I think it would be more likely the fact that the referee ignored the 4th official (John Beaton apparently) about the Rogic foul which ultimately led to their goal that they wouldn't want looked at. Theres no way Rogic should be retrospectively punished. It was only a foul FFS not a leg breaker! Interestingly it wasn't a unanimous decision and that's why Allan McGregor wasn't red carded. Do we have a bear on the compliance panel??!!!! ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deanzmeanzheinz 4,312 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 Justice??? The truth is we dodged a couple of bullets both at the game and after the review HG5, Dave Donnellan and Marco 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottyarf37 963 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LochendBilly 8,413 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 2 hours ago, JizzyMonkey said: Well, now that the compliance officer has cleared Shagger is it not about time he was going after Tom Rogic? Shockingly and scandalously it won’t now change the outcome of the game but by banning him retrospectively will punish the Terrorist Fannybois for their next game To add a footnote why is Shagger being persecuted by other fans and sections of the mhedia? Last week at Motherwell and just on Sunday against the bheasts with people calling for the compliance officer to get involved? My only thought is others are running scared because they know that with a few tweaks here and there that the Rangers are back and will be right in the mix until the death We May not get 55 this year but we’ll sure as fuck get our 55 before they get their 10 Wrong mate, 55 is happening this year. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howsitgoing 4,281 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 The blatant dive by Christie was more apt for the compliance officer to look at but the fenian media barely gave it a mention so these arseholes will do nothing. mchammer, Straight-Edge-Loyal and Aubie92 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,780 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 12 minutes ago, Deanzmeanzheinz said: Justice??? The truth is we dodged a couple of bullets both at the game and after the review The CO / panel would have been fully aware of legislation. How can rules being applied accurately and fairly at a review panel be dodging bullets? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gman36 3,456 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 2 hours ago, JizzyMonkey said: Well, now that the compliance officer has cleared Shagger is it not about time he was going after Tom Rogic? Shockingly and scandalously it won’t now change the outcome of the game but by banning him retrospectively will punish the Terrorist Fannybois for their next game To add a footnote why is Shagger being persecuted by other fans and sections of the mhedia? Last week at Motherwell and just on Sunday against the bheasts with people calling for the compliance officer to get involved? My only thought is others are running scared because they know that with a few tweaks here and there that the Rangers are back and will be right in the mix until the death We May not get 55 this year but we’ll sure as fuck get our 55 before they get their 10 For me this is a step too far on the conspiracy front. Come on to fuck if they never scored with that counter attack they'd have probably scored later on. They got the goal they needed then the game was done. That game was only going one way. We just have to accept it. Bearsden bear, Deanzmeanzheinz and Terry Hurlock Loyal 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 The precedents were set with the Brown elbow and Naismith stamp. They’ve essentially done away with retrospective punishment for violent conduct, in order to avoid punishing Scott Brown. Polo, HG5, Mr Soprano and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brackley Bluenose 4,479 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 2 hours ago, JizzyMonkey said: Well, now that the compliance officer has cleared Shagger is it not about time he was going after Tom Rogic? Shockingly and scandalously it won’t now change the outcome of the game but by banning him retrospectively will punish the Terrorist Fannybois for their next game To add a footnote why is Shagger being persecuted by other fans and sections of the mhedia? Last week at Motherwell and just on Sunday against the bheasts with people calling for the compliance officer to get involved? My only thought is others are running scared because they know that with a few tweaks here and there that the Rangers are back and will be right in the mix until the death We May not get 55 this year but we’ll sure as fuck get our 55 before they get their 10 The panel look at Rogic? You do realise it’s a football match? HG5 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 65,028 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 It's not 'justice', it's a very, very fortunate decision that has went our way. HG5 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,275 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 Load of pish Rogic did nothing to warrant attention of compliance officer, Christey on the other hand. Marco 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 How can you say justice prevailed he kicked the cunt? He’s a lucky lucky bastard. ? HG5, Marco and Mr Soprano 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueKnight87 17,305 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 25 minutes ago, Ger_onimo said: The precedents were set with the Brown elbow and Naismith stamp. They’ve essentially done away with retrospective punishment for violent conduct, in order to avoid punishing Scott Brown. This ? I would also be asking why Christie blatant dive isn't been looked at again either. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozblue 4,331 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 30 minutes ago, jintybear said: I was listening to H&H yesterday and apparently there is no precedence set over any previous game. I think it would be more likely the fact that the referee ignored the 4th official (John Beaton apparently) about the Rogic foul which ultimately led to their goal that they wouldn't want looked at. Theres no way Rogic should be retrospectively punished. It was only a foul FFS not a leg breaker! Interestingly it wasn't a unanimous decision and that's why Allan McGregor wasn't red carded. Do we have a bear on the compliance panel??!!!! ? 3 I was being a bit flippant with my comment, Jinty, and your synopsis is probably closer to the mark about Rogic; it is even debatable about it being a foul if you listen to the opinions of some of the ex-EPL and SPFL referees who disagree on the subject. As regards to this compliance panel, I don't know if it's a revolving panel of 3 ex-officials or whether the same 3 sit on every case, but I hope at least one of them is a bear. HG5 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 74,053 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShanksRFC 3,870 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 Get over it fs, games done. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
five stars 1,627 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 It was a clear foul on Jack and should of been a free-kick in a decent position for us. It also left us a man short defensively, Jack was part of our defensive unit to counter potential break aways from corners. Being a man short gave them the space to cut us open. Rogics tackle on Jack was never a booking, although he was lucky to escape been booked for a tackle shortly before on Barasic, and for hauling down Kent in a potential break away. We're only 4 games into the season and already incompetent referees have cost us points in 50% of our games. What chance do we have? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
coopsleftboot 5,512 Posted September 5, 2018 Share Posted September 5, 2018 42 minutes ago, BlueKnight87 said: This ? I would also be asking why Christie blatant dive isn't been looked at again either. It needs media intervention and re-running on a variety of outlets including radio discussion and phone-ins. You know, like what happened with Sone Aluko. BlueKnight87 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.