Kevin Clancy

[Polo 1,435]

 

[MacBoyd 5,521]

Cheating soap dodgers bastard

[MacBoyd 5,521]

Oh so we change words on here now too, becoming like fat Dingwalls shitty forum

[beararse 6,408]

5 hours ago, MurrayWilson said:

Pish to be fair. So a referee can making a totally shocking decision like that and because we dont shhot more and because we defend poorly it doesnt matter? Fuck knows where you are coming from with that.

Never said it didn’t matter. It’s about making sure it doesn’t matter after 90mins.  If referees are influencing results such that the opposition wins by one goal then we need to try and score more to  reduce their influence on the final result.

It’s quite simple really.

if you don’t shoot your going to struggle to score.

As a team we are shot shy when compared to celtic. 

[graeme_4 34,779]

Tin hat on, but I was in the company of a Rangers supporting ref who thought it was correctly disallowed.

Soft, but a push from Morelos and both holding (which normally ends up a freekick to the defender). Wasn’t a clear and obvious error for VAR to send him to the monitor. 

Need to see it back not absolutely blootered.

[graeme_4 34,779]

6 hours ago, Don54 said:

He was aided and abetted by that cunt Walsh on VAR

Not really. Walsh is a good ref. 

[Albertz85 948]

What will change. Nothing.

Feel sick/deflated. Not 100% sure we would have got the win regardless but to take lead at their ground is huge in how the game shapes.

Media will cover this up and move on sharpish.

[Albertz85 948]

32 minutes ago, graeme_4 said:

Tin hat on, but I was in the company of a Rangers supporting ref who thought it was correctly disallowed.

Soft, but a push from Morelos and both holding (which normally ends up a freekick to the defender). Wasn’t a clear and obvious error for VAR to send him to the monitor. 

Need to see it back not absolutely blootered.

Personally I see that as a foul to us if anything.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,888]

1 hour ago, graeme_4 said:

Tin hat on, but I was in the company of a Rangers supporting ref who thought it was correctly disallowed.

Soft, but a push from Morelos and both holding (which normally ends up a freekick to the defender). Wasn’t a clear and obvious error for VAR to send him to the monitor. 

Need to see it back not absolutely blootered.

Both were holding. Johnston was trying to get to the ball and his body weight was all wrong. He effectively fell/ twisted forward and missed the ball. Morelos had his hand up which would have prevented Johnston coming into the space he wanted, and used, to score.

Morelos didn't use anywhere near the force needed to push Johnston or cause him to fall or vacate the space in front of Morelos. It was 100% a legitimate goal.

I agree with the point on var as there was no element of it Clamcy didn't see. He's a cheating bastard and saw what he wanted to see.

Some on here think if anything it was a foul to us. I just believe it was almost a nothing incident that happens dozens of times at set plays and the only reason it was chalked off was cos it was us scoring it. Like in the 2-1 win years back, identical incidents had different outcomes-  I've no doubt whatsoever Clancy would have given that at the other end.

[ElBufalo20 7,925]

50 minutes ago, Albertz85 said:

Personally I see that as a foul to us if anything.

Yep if no goal it should’ve been a penalty 

[Ross-Gazza genius 1,918]

1 hour ago, graeme_4 said:

Tin hat on, but I was in the company of a Rangers supporting ref who thought it was correctly disallowed.

Soft, but a push from Morelos and both holding (which normally ends up a freekick to the defender). Wasn’t a clear and obvious error for VAR to send him to the monitor. 

Need to see it back not absolutely blootered.

Tbh I thought it was soft as fuck, but when I seen the replay I knew they weren't going to overturn it. The foul starts earlier when that wee mutant has his arms around Morelos then Morelos just wrestles to get away from him. Decision should've been a penalty if not a goal for me. 

[jintybear 8,567]

13 hours ago, Jamie0202 said:

Yip.

I'm sure we were discussing this on here a few weeks ago well before he got announced as the referee for today's game and we both agreed that that ghame qwas the most blatant cheating from a referee since Madden in the Hibs game when Tav got put in to a headlock by Stokes and Jack got sent off.

I thought that was Beaton. Matters not the fact remains that all their greeting works. Clancy is the most blatant cheat of them all 

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,888]

2 hours ago, graeme_4 said:

Need to see it back not absolutely blootered.

Johnson gets it all wrong only to be outdone by Clancy.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,888]

Fair point.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,888]

 

Identical situations, different outcomes. All decisions against us. He sees what he wants, and big decisions constantly go against us.

Nothing changed from that game to yesterday. A cheat then, a.cheat now. A shit ref yes, but that's never purely down to incompetence.

[magic8ball 27,901]

14 hours ago, Jamie0202 said:

It can't overturn. It can't mate.

It can ask him to look at it again but doesn't have the power or remit to overturn. You and I will agree that it should have been a goal. I've spoke to plenty of people with green tinted specs today who agree. Even Walker agreed which is telling.

It still comes down to the on-field decision though and the referee makes the final decision.

We won't find out but I would love to know if Clancy told VAR that he had a decent view and that he didn't need to review it. The review was very quick and the more we're discussing it the more I'm convinced that was the case.

It was exceptionally quick the VAR check ,Probably the quickest there has been in Scotland since it was introduced .Considering our VAR is the cheap Shitey version normally makes our decisions drag out longer .

[ElBufalo20 7,925]

Can someone explain why he blew for the foul after the ball hit the net?

If it’s a clear foul he’d have blown straight away.

Also a clear foul on Jack from Taylor

[Jakes Pal 5,646]

Definition of cheat verb from the Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary

cheat

 verb

/tʃiːt/

/tʃiːt/

Verb Forms

Idioms Phrasal Verbs

 [intransitive] cheat (at something) to act in a dishonest way in order to gain an advantage, especially in a game, a competition, an exam, etc.

He cheats at cards.

 (British English) Have you ever cheated in an exam?

 (North American English) Have you ever cheated on an exam?

(Scottish English) Kevin Tarrier Bastard Clancy.

You're not allowed to look at the answers—that's cheating.

Anyone caught cheating will be automatically disqualified from the examination.

Why would anyone want to lie or cheat?

TOPICS Games and toysB1, Personal qualitiesB1

[magic8ball 27,901]

9 minutes ago, ElBufalo20 said:

Can someone explain why he blew for the foul after the ball hit the net?

If it’s a clear foul he’d have blown straight away.

Also a clear foul on Jack from Taylor

Think he’s bought the reaction from rubber face when he was on the deck .

[sausagetrunks 6,058]

we have to put the pressure on so he doesnt ref another game of ours. 

[dummiesoot 16,034]

37 minutes ago, magic8ball said:

Think he’s bought the reaction from rubber face when he was on the deck .

He is a diving cheating wee cunt as well

[GersInCanada 7,775]

If the Alfredo incident had happened at the other end of the pitch then the goal stands and quite rightly.

Clancy just could not stand the thought of us being 1 up after 20 minutes or so. End of story.

[Malkster 4,917]

26 minutes ago, dummiesoot said:

He is a diving cheating wee cunt as well

Absolutely, rubberface made a cnut of it and thought, I'll dive and claim a foul.

Clancy, as if by telepathy thought, I'll go with that

[BLUEDIGNITY 33,682]

It was a goal but clancy feels that powerful now because nobody stands up to him and his likes and makes decisions to suit his agenda with glee. We are spineless deal with it.

[OhW 4,676]

10 minutes ago, GersInCanada said:

If the Alfredo incident had happened at the other end of the pitch then the goal stands and quite rightly.

Clancy just could not stand the thought of us being 1 up after 20 minutes or so. End of story.

Are you trying to make “end of story” your catchphrase?