Jump to content

“Pundits”


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, AGC123 said:

The TikTok Todd comment was embarrassing, fine if it’s on your personal social media but as an impartial commentator a disgrace 

That's only going to get worse. Clearly he hasn't seen Kyogos tiktok they are far worse.

Sutton has it in for a lad half his age its proper weird

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, BlueVanguard said:

That's only going to get worse. Clearly he hasn't seen Kyogos tiktok they are far worse.

Sutton has it in for a lad half his age its proper weird

He's a jilted lover, I think at Norwich Todd was one of his favs and now he's done the dirty on him by signing for us. Guys a joke. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, OrangeRab said:

Why do we have to suffer Sutton for Sky and Stewart on Sportscene?

Neither have the ability to remain impartial.

They take every opportunity to try and advance the myth that every decision goes against celtic.

With the clear intention of increasing the pressure on officials. 

Both were embarrassing today.

It's been that way for years now with media coverage. 

Always a bias pro-taig pundit who will push thier narrative.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Goldson incident was a 100% pen by today's laws.

Ours was 100% too.

They should've had a red (yellowx2).

Silva was a diving and whining shit, bar the pen.

 

That's my honest opinion with the Blue specs removed, that's how it's done mutton ya fucking cabbage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We've always had to endure celtic cheerleaders, enough is enough.

 

At least Andy Walker pretended he was impartial but his give away was always praising celtic for goals scored & criticising them for goals conceded - that's how fans see games.

 

Now we've got Chris Sutton who is essentially just a professional troll. 

 

Why not just draft in someone like Steve McMannamon or Jermaine Jenas or something that do co-comms in England, they can give an impartial perspective I'm sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sutton doesn't bother me one iota. Boyd is just as bad if your calling it 'biased' he played with them for years FS what do you expect. Stewart however is another deal entirely. Fucking horrible wee rat 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ready1873 said:

Sutton doesn't bother me one iota. Boyd is just as bad if your calling it 'biased' he played with them for years FS what do you expect. Stewart however is another deal entirely. Fucking horrible wee rat 

Difference is Boyd isn’t on commentary. And you do get pundits like McCoist and Miller who have played for the OF and can remain somewhat impartial whilst commenting and given an honest opinion on the game.

Why even bother with Sutton or Stewart. Already know what they’re going to say.


 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 18 May 2024 11:30 Until 13:30
      0  
      Hearts v Rangers
      Tynecastle
      Scottish Premiership
×
×
  • Create New...